TIIE - Program Report

From Karnataka Open Educational Resources
Revision as of 05:52, 24 March 2023 by Anusha sharma (talk | contribs) (Created page with "== 1. Executive Summary – APD == == 2. Introduction – APD == == 3. Program Objectives – APD == == 4. Program Design & Methodology – APD (include whatever is already...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

1. Executive Summary – APD

2. Introduction – APD

3. Program Objectives – APD

4. Program Design & Methodology – APD (include whatever is already there in program design document; include baseline report link)

      planned processes – reaching out to teachers, teacher educators, officials, CRP workshops, BIERT interactions

      modules link - TBD

5. Implementation – GMP, NB

      how sessions were organised

      how planned activities happened - cluster meetings, NIMHANS, CRP workshops, BIERT, resource centre setup, event based camps,

6. Student Endline – MI, AS

1. Endline objectives

2. Methodology – sampling, process, tools

3. Findings (objective, only factual)

1. Math

2. Lang

7. Reflections on the program

       1. Students (feedback) – AS, MI (quant of coded part to derive categories, themes); NB – summary

          feedback from event based (forms, videos) - TBD

       2. Teachers (feedback) – 5 schools teachers(AY), teachers met through cluster meetings (NB, AS), event based camps (GMP)

       3. HMs

          HMs not being able to give time and other workload. Challenges in each school.

          School info written by AY

8. Analysis (our perspective)

      analysis of the findings, what could be the reasons, implications, etc.

      case studies – hyperlink externally (RS to review and edit)

      school

   • students

   • teachers

   • parents perspectives, challenges, awareness,

      administrative support

   • infra

   • staff, vacancies

   academic support

   • BIERT

   • CRP

   • block resource centre – IE resources wasn’t already existing

   • inclusive edu resource center

   medical/health support

   • NIMHANS

   9. Recommendations

   • School & Teachers

   • School system

       ◦ Academic

       ◦ Administrative

       ◦ Policy

   10. Conclusion

Notes:

program focused on foundational competencies and not syllabus which teachers would have focused on.

What was done in the program could have helped students make better sense of grade level curriculum also.

Better engagement observed by teachers


Where to include SEL stuff?

Do analysis by grade, gender